INTERNATIONAL ISSUESROBERT E. MARKLAND, Feature Editor, College of Business Administration, University of South CarolinaOperations Management Education in Hong Kong: Some Observationsby Jaydeep Balakrishnan, Faculty of Management, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta
This article examines
Operations Management (OM) education at business schools in Hong
Kong, primarily at the undergraduate level, in a period of
significant change. These observations result from discussions
the author has had with faculty members from the different
universities in Hong Kong and written information available from
the universities themselves. The focus is on OM education in the
business schools (although at most of these universities, OM-
related courses were also offered by the engineering faculty).
The experiences of the Hong Kong universities in adapting OM
offerings to meet the shift to a service-based economy will
provide insights for others facing the same changes.
During the same period, the population grew from 5.4 million to
6.1 million, and the annual constant dollar GDP growth was about
6%. This implies a greater role for services, which is supported
by the figure. The employment in the export-import sector, just
one area in the service sector, increased from less than 175,000
persons to more than 525,000 persons between 1985 and 1995. This
one sector alone offset a large proportion of the large job loss
in
manufacturing. However, OM programs in Hong Kong share some of
the same problems faced by their counterparts elsewhere in the
worldža perception that OM is no longer relevant in a service-
based economy.
Second, studying Hong Kong universities offers a unique
opportunity to compare alternative strategies. Hong Kong has six
universities, all publicly funded, which offer business
education. They are all situated within a small geographical
area. Since these universities are affected by the same external
factors, the effects of different strategies followed by the
universities can be compared more easily.
The six universities are:
The universities use open days to attract students to the
different programs. On open days, high school students visit the
campus to meet with faculty members, tour the departmental
facilities, attend informative sessions and the like. The
departments put a lot of work into promoting themselves. This
helps the students because a joint entrance procedure includes
all the universities and provides students with relevant
information prior to applying.
Depending on the business school, students are admitted to the BBA program
(integrated admission), first taking a common core and later majoring
in different areas, or students are admitted directly to the different
departments. Degrees in business normally take only 3 years to complete
as students will have completed 13 years of schooling before entering
a university. Except at the Chinese University, where courses may be taught
in English, Cantonese, or Mandarin, the other universities in Hong Kong
use English exclusively. The curriculums are quite similar to those in
North America. This is not surprising since many of the faculty members
have degrees from North America. Hong Kong is also a hub of East Asian
business. So courses related to China, Japan and other East Asian countries
are also taught. The details of the programs are given in Table
1.
Thus opening OM electives to non-business students might be an
effective way to increase enrollment, depending on the curriculum
of other faculties. This will result in an increased appreciation
of OM in the future. Of course, there will be issues such as the
pedagogy, as the students will be from different backgrounds (as
in an MBA class). Perhaps it may be better to stop worrying about
majors and concentrate on enrollments in individual courses.
Attracting majors without ensuring job opportunities may backfire
on the OM area. If employers do not recognize OM in their hiring,
the result would be low employment rates for OM majors. This
might result in a backlash and low OM enrollments over the next
few years.
Strategy B: Offer OM as a separate degree. The two
universities that offer separate degrees in OM or QAB are doing
quite well. (QAB is substituted for OM in the case of City U. QAB
shares some of the same problems that OM has in attracting
students. Thus OM is not at a disadvantage when compared with
QAB. So, if QAB is successful, then it is likely that OM would
also be successful, as seen in the MA in QAB program at City U in
the table). This is another option for encouraging education in
OM. But this goes against the prevailing philosophy of an
integrated business education. Students in each degree may
concentrate on their field and not see the interrelationships
between the
different fields due to gaps in their studies. For this reason
the universities in Hong Kong seem to be moving toward a more
integrated approach.
Another disadvantage of this structure is that the OM area may have less control
over whether OM is taught in other departments, because each department
will have more control over their own course offerings than they would
have in an integrated degree. In an integrated degree program, decisions
regarding the curriculum will be made by a multi-disciplinary committee.
As a result it is more likely that students will be exposed to all relevant
business fields. As seen from the table, only
at CUHK do all business students take OM. (All the MBA programs in Hong
Kong require students to take a course in OM because the MBA programs
tend to be integrated. Thus, curriculum decisions are made by consensus
from all areas.) This means that a majority of students graduating with
undergraduate degrees in business from Hong Kong have not taken an OM
course. This is certainly a genuine concern.
First, graduating future managers who have no appreciation for OM
issues does not bode well for business competitiveness or OM. One
non-OM faculty member gave an example of a student project
presentation that he attended, where he could identify crucial OM
issues that had been missed. Apparently, these issues were
ignored because the student group presenting, who had never taken
an OM course, did not even recognize them as issues. In that
respect, even though the CUHK has very few students taking
electives, all the nearly 500 students graduating each year will
have had some exposure to OM. Second, enrollment in OM electives
will be low due to lack of knowledge about the area. It is
heartening to note that HKUST will soon require all business
students to take an
introductory OM course.
Strategy C: Place more emphasis on services. Both the City
U and HKUST are considering new programs in Service Operations
Management. This is quite relevant given the nature of Hong
Kong's economy. Major sectors include import-export, finance, and
tourism. Most graduating students are likely to be employed in
the service sector. Thus, traditional manufacturing-based OM
courses have to be modified to reflect the changing nature of the
economy.
Strategy D: Offer very little in the way of OM. HKU and
HKBU do not offer much in the way of OM courses. Both these
schools have considerably fewer faculty members than the other
four schools. They have chosen a focused strategy. HKU offers a
BBA in
Accounting and Finance in addition to a BBA General. HKBU has
several majors. Thus, they have focused their limited faculty
personnel resources toward these majors. As a result very few OM
courses are offered.
In summary, different universities in Hong Kong are taking
different routes in OM education given the challenges. Different
strategies will have advantages and disadvantages in the long
run. It might be worthwhile examining these issues in more
detail to learn from the experiences of these universities.
Note: The author would like to thank Professor Clay
Whybark, Visiting Professor, Chinese University of Hong Kong, for
his useful comments regarding this article.
|