Decision Sciences Journal
Volume 29, Number 2
Spring 1998
Strategic Information Systems Planning: Planning System Dimensions,
Internal Coalignment, and Implications for Planning Effectiveness
Albert H. Segars
Department of Management, The Kenan-Flagler Business School,
CB# 3490, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel
Hill, NC 27599-3490, email: al_segars@unc.edu
Varun Grover and James T.C. Teng
Department of Management Science, College of Business Administration,
The University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29210
Abstract: Improving strategic information systems planning
(SISP) remains a critical concern of both practitioners and academics.
To date, a rather large number of studies have examined or proposed
analytical techniques, frameworks, and tools for developing strategic
plans. As a direct consequence of this emphasis, methodologies
have often become the basis for characterizing the entire process
of SISP within the information systems literature. Recent theoretical
work suggests that such characterizations are unnecessarily narrow
and that planning activities within organizations can be more
accurately conceptualized as systems of behaviors, agendas, or
process dimensions. Working within this contemporary theoretical
perspective, the findings of this study suggest that SISP can
be operationalized along distinct dimensions of comprehensiveness
(extent of solution search), formalization (rules and procedures
to guide activities), focus (creativity or control), flow (top
down, bottom up), participation (number and variety of planners),
and consistency (frequency of planning cycles). Similar to previous
theoretical work and case studies, higher order factor modeling
of these dimensions suggests that planning systems that exhibit
aspects of rationality (high comprehensiveness, high formalization,
control focus, top-down flow), and adaptation (high participation,
high consistency) are positively associated with planning effectiveness.
Subject Areas: MIS/DSS and Computer Systems, Strategic
Planning, and Structural Equation Modeling. |